Obama intends to paint Mitt Romney as the Wall Street candidate

Obama intends to paint Mitt Romney as the Wall Street candidate, and when you look at a chart of Romney’s campaign donors you can see how that plan might work.
Source Opensecrets.org
Romney received over $560 thousand from Goldman Sachs for his 2012 campaign. Citigroup contributed $285 thousand to the campaign.

As I reported in an earlier article Goldman Sachs contributed $1,013,091.00 to Obama’s 2008 campaign, and Citigroup contributed $736,771.00.

That’s almost twice as much as they contributed to Romney this year. The thing is, Goldman gave Obama
only $80,224.00 this year.

So it may be easy to make Romney look like a Wall Street Candidate. That is until you look at how much Obama and the Democratic National Committee have collected from Wall Street so far this year, $15.6 million to Romney’s $7.5 million.

President Obama has raised and spent money for his re-election through the DNC (Democratic National Committee) allowing him to collect bigger checks from donors in the financial industry.

Source The Washington Post

Still almost half $85,336,863 (45%) of Obama’s campaign money is coming from Small Individual Contributions.
Source Opensecrets.org
While only $9,145,126 (11%) of Romney’s campaign finances come from Small Individual Contributions.
Source Opensecrets.org

Kind of looks like Obama has the support of Wall Street and the small individual contributor, while Romney’s supporters aren’t showing much.

If we really want Mitt Romney to win this election we had better get busy.

You already know that Obama won the 2008 election with the help of Wall Street support. But the movement that got him elected was the support of young voters and small donors, that’s happening again.

So what if Romney is a Wall Street Candidate? We need someone who understands the Economy and how it works. He can also be the Main Street Candidate…

But that may not happen unless Main Street and the Small Individual Supporters get involved and make it happen. That’s not as hard to do as you might think. You can make a difference, we all can.

Since there are over 50 million registered republican voters, if just half of us Donate as little as $5.00 each, then we can make a big difference ($125. million difference).
…………………… But, what may be more important than the money is the tangible show of support.

So spread the word, tell your friends that we need to get busy if we want a real change…

Forward this to your contact list, help them understand why this is important.

What do you think we should do? Leave a comment, maybe you have a good idea.

P.S. Click on this link to make donations to the Romney Campaign

Gingrich would he happier if we didn’t see evidence of his past record.

I imagine Newt Gingrich would he happier if we didn’t see evidence that his past is a little different from his stories. And you can’t really blame him.

After all we are asked to compare his background to that of Romney and Santorum.

Newt regularly brings up the charge that Romney is a successful businessman and that he didn’t pay any more tax than he legally had to. As if the rest of us want to pay more tax than we have to.
It may be that the our tax system is off-balance and needs to be changed, but that doesn’t make Romney wrong.

Newt has tried to use other negative ads in his campaign, but they turned out to be mostly if not completely false.

  • A pro-Newt Gingrich super PAC, claims that Romney “thinks judges can overrule parents on abortions.” NOT TRUE
  • At the time, in 2002, Romney was actually arguing against giving 16- and 17-year-old girls a legal right to abortion without consent of either parent.

  • Gingrich’s most savage attack so far, Winning Our Future began airing an ad the afternoon of Jan. 27 going after Romney for his association with a company that committed Medicare fraud while he was a director in the 1990s.
  • The ad strains to imply falsely that Romney was guilty of criminal conduct. At one point the words “illegal activity” appear superimposed over Romney’s face. But the truth is that Mitt was never implicated in any illegal activity.

  • Newt’s ad goes after Romney for raising “fees and taxes” in Massachusetts.
    The ad says Romney “refused to support” the Bush tax cuts when he was governor, and that’s true.
  • Romney pointedly refused to endorse the Bush tax cuts in 2003, although he never publicly opposed them, either.

  • It goes on and on, you can read a report at Factcheck.org

    His latest negative ad accuses Romney of being dishonest, is it no wonder that Gingrich would like to be the one that tells his story, the way he wants us to hear it.

    As for Romney he has run some negative ads and some of them are questionable. This latest ad features then-NBC Nightly News anchor Tom Brokaw reporting in 1997 on ethics charges against Newt Gingrich. It seems right on to me.

    Watch the Video

    NBC News today is requesting that the Romney campaign remove NBC material from an ad that went up yesterday in Florida attacking Newt Gingrich for 1990s-era House ethics charges.

    The ad prominently features then-NBC Nightly News anchor Tom Brokaw reporting in 1997 on the ethics charges at the top of the Nightly News broadcast that evening, Politico reported this morning.

    “The NBC Legal Department has written a letter to the campaign asking for the removal of all NBC News material from their campaign ads,” said Lauren Kapp, NBC senior vice president for marketing and communications, in a statement. Kapp added, “Similar requests have gone out to other campaigns that have inappropriately used Nightly News, Meet the Press, Today and MSNBC material.”

    Brokaw also released a statement voicing his personal concerns.

    “I am extremely uncomfortable with the extended use of my personal image in this political ad,” he said. “I do not want my role as a journalist compromised for political gain by any campaign.”
    MSNBC

    Newt Gingrich is good at saying the things that we want to hear.

  • Though a base on the moon may not be very high on the list of things most of us want to see.
  • One thing that he wants to keep quiet is his record, I don’t blame him. But to accuse Romney of being the only one running negative ads says a lot about Newt. What do you think?